Water and Steam
Generic project management in GMP environments creates a translation problem. The PM reports to you, the engineers report to the PM, and critical technical decisions get filtered through someone who cannot evaluate them. The timeline slips. The scope drifts. The regulator asks a question nobody on your side can answer without a call to the vendor.
Our PMs are senior pharma engineers first, project managers second. They have written URS documents. They have run FAT and SAT protocols. They have sat across from EMA inspectors. When a technical question lands on their desk, they answer it or they know exactly who on your team should.
Cross-functional PM for CapEx programmes, tech transfers, and facility build-outs. Fixed monthly fee, defined deliverables, agreed reporting cadence. You know what the PM owns and what it costs before the first kickoff meeting.
Every engagement produces a structured project record for your team. Decision log, risk register, vendor correspondence, regulatory submissions. When we roll off, your internal PM or programme lead inherits a complete, readable record. Nothing lives in our heads. Nothing walks out the door.
The best outcome of any PM engagement is that you do not need us next time. We design every engagement around that goal. Your internal team shadows the work, inherits the tools, and owns the methodology when we leave. The next facility build, tech transfer, or CapEx programme runs with your own PM in the chair.
This is DIY Engineering applied to programme management. The Scandinavian model. We give you the expert next to you, the templates that hold up to inspection, and the decision frameworks that work in your organisation. You build the capability. You keep it.
Tell us the scope. We come back within 24 hours with a named PM, a proposed engagement structure, and a fixed monthly fee. No hourly estimates. No junior understudies.